Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Private Roads Homes Association topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents ask Shakopee council for help on privately maintained Dean Lakes hill; staff says road is private and utilities are limited
Summary
Two Eagle Creek area homeowners told the Shakopee City Council on Feb. 4 that an informal homeowners association responsible for a private hill and road toward Dean's Lake is no longer functioning and asked whether the city could help with maintenance and snow removal.
Two residents from the Eagle Creek area on Feb. 4 asked the Shakopee City Council to help resolve ongoing maintenance and snow-plowing problems on a steep private roadway that serves about 10 homes near Dean's Lake.
Kayla Dornfeld and Tiffany Klingenberg told the council they had an informal homeowners association that previously arranged for snow removal and other maintenance, but that the association has no recorded governing documents and little money. Dornfeld said previous attempts to locate formal documentation failed and that she had searched county records without success.
Council members and staff clarified that the roadway is a private street and that the city does not maintain private roads or utilities located on them. A city staff member who responded during the public-comment exchange said the roadway is near County Road 16 east of County Road 83 and identified local features, including Eagle Creek Boulevard and Dean's Lake. The staff member said there are private roads fronting the south side of Dean's Lake and confirmed there are about 10 houses that use the hill and driveway.
Councilors advised residents on typical options: coordinate with the county for title research and property-record inquiries; consult private legal counsel to determine whether any recorded agreement exists; consider forming a legally recognized homeowners association or petitioning the city for street improvements (which typically requires the property owners to waive appeal rights to assessments and accept associated costs). Staff noted sewer service would be expensive to extend because the nearest sewer would need to come a long distance through existing development, while water is somewhat easier to extend.
Mayor Lehman and Councilor Whiting encouraged the residents to provide contact information to staff for follow-up and suggested staff would continue researching the parcel history and possible paths forward. The council emphasized that the city generally does not assume maintenance responsibility for private roads that do not meet city standards unless there is an extraordinary safety issue and a formal acceptance process occurs.
Councilors and staff suggested next steps: confirm ownership records with Scott County; consult with city engineering regarding the feasibility and cost of utility extension and street reconstruction; and consider legal counsel to determine whether any prior association documents were filed. The meeting record shows staff will continue research and follow up with the residents who spoke.
No formal council action was taken during the Feb. 4 public-comment period; the exchange was recorded as information and direction to staff to research the situation and maintain contact with the residents.
