Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pension Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves retirement option for police and fire chiefs; debate over extending option to rank-and-file continues
Summary
The City Council approved an ordinance to permit a DROP-style retirement option for the police and fire chiefs on a 4–3 vote after extended debate about fairness to rank-and-file members and a commitment by the administration to fund actuarial studies for broader employee groups if the measure moves forward.
The Omaha City Council approved an amendment to the municipal code to authorize a deferred retirement option program (DROP) for the police and fire chiefs in a 4–3 vote, following a lengthy public discussion about whether the benefit should be extended to rank-and-file members of the police and fire bargaining units.
Deputy City Attorney Bernard Inabusch confirmed the city obtained an actuarial analysis for the chiefs’ proposal that showed a nonnegative impact on the pension system for the limited management group. Councilmembers and union leaders urged caution about equity for other sworn personnel. Trevor Talley, president of the Omaha Professional Firefighters, said the issue raised fairness questions for roughly 700 firefighters he represents: “If this benefit was offered to the members of local 385, it would be an all or none, which means we can all take advantage of it or none of us can take advantage of it.” Talley emphasized such a change would have to be negotiated and put to his membership.
Councilmember Danny Begley moved and council members discussed a motion to lay the item over to April 8 to allow time for actuarial work and bargaining-unit discussion; the layover motion failed 3–4. During the debate, Bernard Inabusch and administration representatives said if the council approved the chiefs’ option on the ordinance before them, the administration would fund and request an actuarial study for the larger bargaining groups (OPOA and Local 385) and share results with union leadership; the city estimated such studies would take about three to four months.
Council discussion repeatedly referenced process and fairness. Councilmember Amy Melton said she supported the chiefs receiving the benefit now and proposed that rank-and-file unions could later choose whether to adopt the same option: “If they want it, they should get it…they should get to vote.” Other members emphasized the need to avoid unintended pension-system impacts; Deputy City Attorney Inabusch warned that extending the benefit in different forms would likely require collective-bargaining conversations and ordinance changes.
After the failed layover, a motion to approve the ordinance passed on roll call 4–3. The council directed the administration to proceed with the actuarial work for the larger bargaining units and to share findings with union leadership.
