Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Literacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District hears New York Statescience-of-reading guidance; board questions assessments and implementation timeline
Summary
A district presentation introduced New York Stateliteracy briefs and the science-of-reading requirement that districts certify K'through3 curriculum alignment by Sept. 1, 2025; board members pressed for local assessment plans, professional development and measures to address lagging test results.
A staff member presented the New York State Education Departmentliteracy briefs and the staterequirement that districts certify by Sept. 1, 2025, that Kthrough3 curriculum and instructional practice align with the science of reading.
The presenter said the literacy briefs form a seven-part roadmap and described core instructional components the briefs call the "big 6": "oral language development, phonological awareness, phonics, comprehension, fluency and vocabulary development," adding, "those big 6 need to be represented in classrooms from kindergarten all the way through twelfth grade." The presenter also said the briefs include audit tools the district can use to review curriculum and instructional practice.
Board members pressed staff on how the district will measure progress. The presenter said the district will use existing local tools, noting, "We can measure student growth using the FastBridge assessments that we have that are that we use K through 8," and added that the briefs do not mandate specific local assessments or curricula.
The presentation emphasized that the initiative is not a single prescriptive program: "When in fact the science of reading speaks to a body of research, 50 plus years and growing of interdisciplinary research," the presenter said, and that implementation requires a mix of explicit phonics instruction and broader, knowledge-building classroom practices.
Board members raised concerns about recent state test performance and stagnant growth on local measures, asking how the district will move from audit to action. The presenter outlined four planned steps: 1) develop a shared understanding of the science of reading across staff; 2) identify high-leverage instructional routines that align to the research; 3) provide sustained professional learning time for adults; and 4) rebuild assessment systems to identify needs and target interventions.
The presenter said some of the work will focus on Kthrough3 because of the state emphasis, but that the briefs explicitly treat literacy as a pre-K through 12 responsibility. On timing, staff said they will begin using the audit tools with elementary curriculum coordinators and aim to be prepared when the state requests district certification.
Board members asked about resources and next steps. The presenter said review tools and briefs are available to staff and teachers and that district leaders will identify priority professional development areas and align them with other planned initiatives (for example, an elementary math curriculum rollout that will demand professional learning time). The presenter said summer professional development is possible for some topics but cautioned that scheduling and capacity vary by level.
The discussion closed with board members urging that audit findings be translated into concrete implementation plans, progress measures and timelines so the district can show measurable improvement on both internal assessments and state exams.
The board will continue the discussion at future workshops and requested that staff return with an implementation timeline, specific professional learning plans and how audit results will connect to FastBridge and other classroom progress measures.
