Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K 12 Education Ap Courses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Students, teachers and parents urge board to keep year‑long AP (A/B) schedule
Summary
Hundreds of students, several parents and multiple teachers told the Madison County Board of Education on Feb. 6 they oppose a proposal to eliminate year‑long, alternating A/B AP courses and require semester‑long AP classes across the district.
Get email alerts on the K 12 Education Ap Courses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hundreds of students, several parents and multiple teachers told the Madison County Board of Education on Feb. 6 they oppose a proposal to eliminate year‑long, alternating A/B AP courses and require semester‑long AP classes across the district.
Student speakers said the A/B format—where AP classes meet across the full school year on alternating days—gives them extra time to learn, complete assignments and prepare for national AP exams in May. ‘‘It will be very difficult for us to learn and succeed under the extreme conditions that a single‑semester AP class would create,’’ student Nora Patty said during public comment.
Supporters of the current schedule described local survey and petition results and warned that a switch would reduce AP enrollment and qualifying scores. Teacher Lauren Lee Baron presented results from a district survey of current AP students and classroom data: 385 AP students responded, 56% said they would take zero AP classes if AP courses were forced to semester schedule, and 81% reported participation in at least one extracurricular activity. Student organizers said they gathered more than 360 student signatures in favor of keeping year‑long AP classes; Hazel Green students presented 326 signatures from their school.
Why it matters: AP exams are nationally timed in May and, speakers said, a semester‑only schedule would either force students to take an AP class in the fall and wait months before the exam or compress a year of college‑level material into a single semester. Both outcomes, students and teachers said, risk lower retention and higher stress, and could reduce scholarships and college credit opportunities.
Key arguments from speakers - Students and parents: Year‑long AP classes allow pacing, time for remediation and the ability to participate in sports and extracurriculars. ‘‘This will not be the case under a single semester schedule,’’ Cadence Nicole Meyer, a Hazel Green sophomore, said. - Teachers: A year‑long alternating block lets teachers build deeper understanding and provide remediation. Buckhorn AP teacher Lauren Lee Baron said her A+ College Ready training maps materials to a year‑long course and she is experiencing curriculum compression in a semester format. - Counterpoints from board discussion: Board members and staff noted the district must balance course offerings, transfer students and scheduling consistency across six high schools; staff said some schools (Buckhorn, Hazel Green, Sparkman) already use the A/B model while others use semester schedules.
Data and limits cited at the meeting - Superintendent/administrator presented AP qualifying rates by school for several colleges; he and others cautioned the figures do not prove causation and other factors (teacher quality, course selection) affect outcomes. - Teacher survey details provided to the board: 385 AP students responded; 56% said they would drop AP under a semester mandate; 82% said their mental health would be negatively affected by compressed AP schedules.
What the speakers requested Students, parents and teachers asked the board to maintain the district’s existing language that allows schools to offer year‑long AP classes within the block schedule, and at least to delay any unilateral change until the board reviews additional data and hears from school leaders.
Board response and next steps Board members acknowledged strong feelings on both sides and asked staff for additional breakdowns (per‑course AP exam rosters and qualifying rates by class size and school) and attendance/transfer impacts. One board member asked staff to provide course‑level counts (how many students took a course and how many earned qualifying AP exam scores) so the board can compare AB versus semester results without assuming causation.
Speakers - Nora Patty, student (public comment) - Leah Patty, parent (public comment) - Cadence Nicole Meyer, sophomore, Hazel Green High School - Avery Senimore, senior, Sparkman High School - Emerson Wright, junior, Hazel Green High School - Cassandra Sapp, sophomore, Hazel Green High School - Graham Hart, junior, Buckhorn High School - Krista Pickens, junior, Hazel Green High School - Krista/Beth Barnes and Lauren Lee Baron, AP teachers
Ending Board members thanked students and teachers for testifying and said the testimony will be part of the board’s review. No formal policy change or vote on AP scheduling was made at the Feb. 6 meeting; board members asked staff to return with additional analysis.

