Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: council approves contracts, budget adjustments and legislative platform
Summary
The Paramount City Council approved the consent calendar, amended the Premier Aquatic Services agreement, awarded the Progress Park Plaza exterior improvements contract and adopted the 2025 legislative platform; roll-call votes were unanimous where recorded.
At its Jan. 28 meeting the Paramount City Council recorded unanimous roll-call approval on several routine and project items.
- Consent calendar: Approved by roll call (Aguayo, Olmos, Claire Stallings, Vice Mayor Lemons, Mayor Delgadillo — yes). No separate discussion recorded.
- Premier Aquatic Services amendment (Paramount Pool): Council approved Amendment No. 1 to extend the city’s agreement with Premier Aquatic Services, LLC for additional years through Jan. 31, 2028, with year‑one costs of $300,700 already budgeted and a requested additional appropriation of $12,100 in FY 2024–25 to cover the remaining months of Feb–June 2025. Roll-call vote: Aguayo, Olmos, Claire Stallings, Vice Mayor Lemons, Mayor Delgadillo — yes.
- Progress Park Plaza exterior improvement project (City Project No. 9352): Council awarded the construction contract to ARC Construction as the lowest responsive bidder in the amount of $1,646,401.22; including a 10% contingency the total project cost is just over $1.8 million. The city previously received grant funding of $1,850,000 from a former assembly member; staff said it will request remaining grant funds as part of the mid‑year budget adjustment. Roll‑call vote: Aguayo, Olmos, Claire Stallings, Vice Mayor Lemons, Mayor Delgadillo — yes.
- 2025 Legislative Platform (Resolution No. 25-001): Council adopted the city’s 2025 legislative platform to guide future staff positions and letters on state and federal matters. Roll‑call vote: Aguayo, Olmos, Claire Stallings, Vice Mayor Lemons, Mayor Delgadillo — yes.
Where a mover or seconder for motions was not identified in the public record, the council used standard motion/second procedures and votes recorded by the city clerk; no motions failed and no items were tabled in the actions above.
