Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Appeal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fayette County Board of Equalization postpones Imperial Colliery tax appeal to Feb. 12
Summary
The Fayette County Board of Equalization heard a property-tax appeal involving Imperial Colliery Company and delayed action until Feb. 12 after state appraisal staff said discrepancies in two state natural-resource reports needed further review.
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Appeal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Fayette County Board of Equalization on Feb. 6 postponed consideration of an appraisal dispute involving Imperial Colliery Company to the boardFeb. 12 at 9 a.m. while state tax staff investigate mismatching natural-resource valuation reports.
The delay followed testimony from Laurie Friess, who identified herself as a geologist for the state tax division, that the state and the county assessor's databases showed inconsistent land and natural-resource values for multiple parcels. Friess said timber-management program linkages had become 'unlinked' on the assessor's side and that one state report (NR142) showed roughly $1.99 million while another (NR127) showed about $1.00 million for the same parcel, a discrepancy the state's staff said they could not immediately explain.
Why it matters: the state's reported values determine what property owners are told about natural-resource and land appraisals and can affect property tax assessments and the right to appeal. County officials said they wanted state staff to explain which report should govern the district's assessment before the board acts.
What speakers said: Philip (identified in testimony as representing Haroldwood Properties, Johnson Lands and Ontario Colony) said his clients had filed an appeal and were primarily at the meeting to get the state's new appraisals. Laurie Friess said the state's database showed timber management had been removed from certain parcels and that a timing or database 'glitch' might explain the missing land value. A state representative said a database administrator might need to trace where the NR127 figure comes from.
Board action: A commissioner moved and another seconded a motion to postpone the Imperial Colliery Company appeal to the board's Feb. 12 meeting at 9 a.m.; the board voted in favor by voice.
Next steps: County staff said they expect the state to return with clarified numbers before Feb. 12. The board also advised the property owner they could withdraw the appeal and pursue the state Office of Tax Appeals after the state's report is final if the parties cannot agree.
Additional context: County officials said other parcels named in the appealHarwood and Johnson Landshad been resolved during the meeting and only the Imperial Colliery item remained outstanding.
Ending: The board recessed its equalization session until Feb. 12. The county encouraged property owners with valuation questions to follow up with county assessment staff or the state tax division for details.

