Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities Naming topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears plan to form committees, timeline for renaming and modernization naming

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff outlined a process and timeline for facility-naming committees tied to modernization projects, recommending community participation and potential site-level naming for fields and centers.

District staff presented a proposal for naming district facilities tied to current modernization projects and recommended forming citizen advisory committees for site-level naming decisions.

Daniel (Assistant Superintendent for Administrative Leadership, School Support and Safety) told the board the district has a board policy guiding facility naming and suggested the board appoint citizen advisory committees to review name suggestions. He noted that the policy references the board s having authority to name district facilities and that community participation is encouraged: "board policy 7 3 1 0 8," he said, and later added that "the board does, in fact, see have the right name on district facility" (as read at the meeting).

Daniel proposed a timeline tied to ongoing construction and modernization: committee appointments and outreach in the spring, public hearings in April–May, and possible action following the public hearing. He stressed that site-level elements (for example, a soccer field) could have separate naming processes from a campus-level name and that the district would aim to publicize any change to reduce confusion for alumni and families.

Board members discussed committee composition and outreach approaches. One trustee suggested a five- to seven-member committee with representation from the teacher union, classified union, an administrator, parents, community members and a board member. Board members emphasized outreach and suggested including students for middle-school naming discussions.

Staff said they would return with a draft committee composition and timeline. The presentation also referenced the state-required school identification (CDS) code remaining the same if a campus name changed, and staff said they would research rollout steps to preserve transcripts and alumni records.

No action was taken; the board directed staff to draft committee recommendations and an outreach plan for a future meeting.