Benicia Unified reviews Linewize internet-safety platform; board seeks cost, privacy details

2248524 · February 7, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District IT introduced Linewize’s web-filtering, classroom management and student-monitoring products. Vendor said the system includes AI image blurring, parent apps and a free home license; trustees pressed the company on cost, privacy, teacher workload and BYOD coverage.

Benicia Unified School District heard a presentation Thursday from Linewize on an internet-safety and classroom-management platform the company pitches to K–12 districts.

The presentation, introduced by the district’s IT director, described three Linewize product pillars: web filtering and classroom management for CIPA compliance and teacher control; an early-detection monitoring service that flags student safety risks; and parent/community engagement tools, including a free filtering license for one parent device per enrolled child. Linewize said it uses artificial intelligence to blur inappropriate images and can filter video content in real time if adult material is embedded in otherwise permitted video.

The vendor’s representative, Adam Lee of Linewize, said the company serves roughly 1.2 million students in California and holds multiple privacy certifications, including iKeepSafe verification and a California NDPA. “Every line of code that we create … is all about keeping that child at the center, digitally safe,” Lee said. He described a classroom-management feature that allows teachers to view student screens, temporarily unlock selected sites for teaching purposes and push a single “clean” YouTube video that blocks comments and thumbnails.

Trustees and staff focused on cost, privacy and teacher burden. A trustee asked whether the district could block social media and gaming; Lee answered that policies are set by the district and that Linewize ships a set of CIPA-compliant policies that can be adapted. On monitoring, Lee said the company moderates flagged content centrally to reduce false positives delivered to district contacts and noted that its monitoring detects activity occurring outside email—on gaming platforms, AI tools and other cloud services—where many incidents are now detected.

On device coverage, Linewize said district-issued devices carry an agent so they remain filtered anywhere; district network traffic also would be filtered by an on-site appliance. The firm said it cannot control personally owned phones connected to mobile carriers unless parents install the optional home app. Lee said the company provides a free premium license for one parent device per enrolled child and offers parent webinars and a co-branded community hub.

Trustees pressed about teacher workload, and Lee said the tool is intended to be an “efficiency multiplier,” not a dashboard into which teachers must constantly stare. He described brief training and suggested teachers can use a teacher display or a tablet to monitor and, when needed, spotlight a student screen for class-wide discussion.

Cost questions were frequent. Lee provided an estimate the company said would approximate $440,000 annually for a district the size discussed at the meeting and said onboarding and training were included in that price; the company offered a multi-product licensing model (filter, classroom management, monitoring) and said pricing included BYOD support and a cap on annual renewal increases. Board members asked the district to include the proposal in the formal budget review and to get staff feedback before any procurement.

The district did not take action Thursday. IT staff said they will bring comparative cost and contracting options to upcoming budget and procurement sessions for board review.