Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Code Adoption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Coppell panel tables adoption of 2024 International Building Code to April 3; staff to supply comparative amendments
Summary
The Building and Standards Commission postponed a recommendation on adopting the 2024 International Building Code and related local construction chapter, and directed staff to provide a comparative document showing proposed local amendments and the reasoning behind them prior to the April 3 meeting.
The Coppell Building and Standards Commission voted to table consideration of adopting the 2024 International Building Code and the City of Coppell construction chapter until its April 3 meeting and asked staff to provide a comparative document showing proposed amendments, strikethroughs, and staff reasoning.
Chief Building Official Steven Schubert summarized the proposed adoption, explaining the city has operated under the 2015 International codes since 2017 and that the international model codes are updated on a three-year cycle. Schubert said the 2024 code contains several substantive changes affecting sleeping lofts, rooftop occupancies, plumbing and expansive soils work, and other sections. He described a staff reorganization that consolidates construction-related ordinance language into a single “construction chapter” to clarify contractor expectations and permit attachments.
Commissioners said they were broadly supportive of modernizing codes but requested more detail: they asked staff to provide (1) a side-by-side comparison showing current local language, the new 2024 code text and proposed local amendments (strikethrough/new text) and (2) explanations for each recommended local amendment. Several commissioners expressed particular concern about adopting any amendments from the regional North Central Texas Council of Governments (COG/NCTCOG) without a clear, section-by-section explanation of impacts; staff said the COG recommendations typically arrive later in the year and that many COG suggestions repeat prior recommendations.
Schubert noted the city’s ISO insurance-class rating can be affected by whether the municipality adopts current code editions; adopting updated codes is part of the city’s multi-year plan to maintain the rating. Staff said final COG recommendations and the regional fire-code draft are expected later in the year, but recommended proceeding with the proposed local adoption rather than waiting indefinitely. Several commissioners asked for the comparative materials in time to review before the April 3 meeting; staff agreed to provide the documentation via cloud link for commission review.
After discussion the commission voted to table the item to the April 3 meeting with the understanding staff will provide the detailed comparative information and recommended amendments for review. The motion to table carried.
