Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Literacy Pilot topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Duxbury selects CKLA after K–5 literacy pilot; administrators seek capital funds for full rollout

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After piloting IntoReading and CKLA this year, Duxbury Public Schools identified Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) as the preferred K–5 literacy program and will seek funding for materials and implementation planning; pilot covered roughly 380 students and family survey responses were limited.

Duxbury Public Schools officials told the School Committee they will seek capital funding to adopt Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) for K–5 classrooms after a year‑long pilot that compared CKLA with IntoReading.

Elementary curriculum supervisors Mrs. Milner and Mrs. Benoit led the literacy update and said the pilot included teacher focus groups, student interviews, family surveys and benchmarking data. The district piloted two programs across K–5 with roughly two classrooms per grade participating; administrators estimated about 380 students took part across Chandler and Alden elementary schools.

Supervisors told the committee CKLA received the strongest feedback from teachers, families and student focus groups. “CKLA was the clear leader for our feedback from families,” one supervisor said, and student comments cited units such as poetry and Greek myths as memorable classroom experiences.

Administrators presented data showing that, across grades, winter benchmarking results were similar to or improved over the previous year; supervisors said those trends were “promising” given program transitions can cause temporary implementation dips. They noted the pilot used two programs in the same year, so any midyear purchases would require a plan for crosswalking curricula and addressing gaps.

Committee members asked about parent response rates and scale: supervisors said roughly 30 family survey responses were received and acknowledged that was a low return compared with the number of students in the pilot. Several committee members encouraged broader parent engagement for the full implementation.

The supervisors said an implementation plan, including professional development, resource inventory and community outreach, is underway but depends on securing capital funding: the district has placed a funding request on the town capital list and will continue discussions with town fiscal advisory and the select board. They cautioned that the version piloted this year differs from a new district‑wide version that may be adopted next year, so purchasing decisions will be informed by vendor conversations.

The committee did not take a formal vote on curricular adoption at the meeting; administrators said they will continue to work with vendors and district teams to prepare for a possible phased implementation if funds are approved.