Conservation commission updates wetland protection rules; committee recommends adoption
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
The committee recommended adopting small amendments to the conservation commission's wetland protection regulations: adding "resiliency" to protected interests, creating a courtesy review area within 200 feet of Great Ponds, and changing certified-mail return-receipt requirements.
The Select Board reviewed and recommended adoption of modest amendments to the Conservation Commission's wetland protection regulations on Feb. 6.
Jeff (Conservation Commission member) told the committee the commission updated the regulations to add resiliency to the list of interests the commission protects to align with town planning and habitat/recreation goals. The commission also added a nonbinding courtesy review for areas within 200 feet of a Great Pond, and removed a strict requirement that all certified-mail return receipts be returned before a hearing can close; the regulation will instead require mailings at the time of filing to improve practicality and ensure timely notice.
Jeff said the changes are "pretty simple" and intended to align the regulations with the bylaw and with current town planning efforts. A committee member asked how the town defines "Great Pond"; Jeff replied that Great Ponds are defined by the Commonwealth and by the regulations (listing specific local ponds subject to the definition).
The committee moved to adopt the amendments; the motion, made by Peter and seconded by Chris, passed unanimously on roll call: Joe Aye; Joanna Aye; Jeremy Aye; Rob Aye; Chris Aye; Peter Aye; Denise Aye.
The committee recorded the adoption and moved on to Articles 101 and 102.