Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administration Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: golf course fees, EMPG MOA, planning commission appointment and personnel hires approved
Summary
At its Jan. 28 meeting the Madison County Fiscal Court approved a package of routine items: updated Battlefield Golf Course fees effective March 1, acceptance of a fiscal‑year EMPG MOA, appointment to the planning commission, and personnel hiring recommendations; ordinances and other actions noted elsewhere on the agenda were handled separately.
Madison County Fiscal Court approved several resolutions and routine personnel actions at its Jan. 28 meeting. Key votes and outcomes:
- Resolution 2025‑005 (Battlefield Golf Course fee schedule): The court approved an updated fee schedule for Battlefield Golf Course, which will take effect March 1, 2025. The item was presented by Gary and passed on a roll call vote with no recorded opposition.
- Resolution 2025‑006 (EMPG MOA): The court approved a memorandum of agreement for the Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) fiscal‑year 2024 cycle, authorizing execution of the contract with Kentucky Emergency Management and recognizing required county certifications. The resolution authorizes the judge executive or his designee to sign the MOA.
- Resolution 2025‑007 (Planning Commission appointment): The court approved the judge executive’s appointment of Shannon Renfro to the Madison County Planning Commission. The appointment passed; the transcript records one dissenting vote (Master Hughes).
- Personnel and hiring recommendations: The court approved the hiring recommendations presented by Jessica Coffey, including a personnel action recognizing a staff member (Wendy) and related appointments; the motions passed on voice vote.
- Claims and transfers: The court approved claims and transfers as presented.
Motions to approve the items were moved and seconded on the record where noted; courts' roll calls were used to record the outcomes. The court did not take further amendment action on these items during the Jan. 28 meeting.
Ending — These routine administrative and personnel measures were approved, with one recorded dissent on the planning commission appointment; related implementation tasks (contract execution, fee effective dates, personnel onboarding) are to be carried out by the relevant county departments.
