Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Weather Modification Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel narrowly votes to recommend ending statewide weather-modification program
Summary
After extended debate, the committee advanced Senator Beard's bill to end the state's weather-modification program with a 4-2 vote that moved the measure out of committee; members cited mixed testimony from local farmers and officials and concerns about local control and process.
Senate Bill 2106, a measure that would end the state's weather-modification program, received a committee due-pass recommendation on a 4-2 vote after extended debate about local control, evidence and the program's future.
Senator Beard, sponsor of the bill and a proponent of statewide repeal, argued that most counties had already ended weather-modification locally and that remaining programs should be ended statewide: "the time has come to just end this practice," he said. Beard told the committee that in counties where voters worked to remove programs, organizers had to overcome a high petition threshold to reach the ballot.
Opponents and supporters provided mixed testimony at earlier hearings, and several committee members said they had received both technical study material and emotional appeals. Senator Patton recounted that he had spoken with his county commissioner and remained conflicted, expressing concern about overriding local choice.
Senator Vandersteen moved a due-pass recommendation; the clerk recorded 4 ayes, 2 nays, 1 absent. Committee discussion noted prior attempts in the legislature to change local petition thresholds and that such proposals had previously failed on the floor.
The committee's recommendation advances the bill despite recorded dissent and leaves implementation questions about local authority and petition requirements unresolved.
