Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism Grant topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House rejects $500,000 ski-resort infrastructure grant after debate over state role
Summary
House Bill 15-23, a $500,000 pass-through grant request for infrastructure repairs at the Frostfire ski resort, failed after committee members said the state should not assume responsibility for the request despite sponsor testimony about tourism and recent storm damage.
The House voted down House Bill 15-23, a request for a $500,000 Parks and Recreation pass-through grant to a ski-resort infrastructure project, after debate over whether the state should fund repairs at the privately operated resort.
Representative Munson, the bill sponsor, urged members to support the request and described the resort as "an important economic engine" for northeastern North Dakota, detailing staff, payroll, tourism draw (including Canadian visitors), and recent damage including a collapsed theater roof and foundation issues caused by heavy rain. Munson said the resort had undertaken capital improvements but now needed state help to complete repairs and new construction intended to attract more visitors.
Representative Neron, speaking for the Agriculture Committee, said the committee recommended a do-not-pass vote. "While the testimony of the value of this business to the local community was compelling, the committee felt that the funding requested was not a state responsibility," Neron said.
Representative Belt asked whether the resort had insurance for the roof collapse; the record indicates the committee did not receive a clear answer on that question during testimony. The clerk recorded the final vote as 39 yeas and 52 nays; the bill was declared failed.
Sponsor testimony noted the request required an equal nonstate match and described broader tourism and community benefits; opponents emphasized precedent and limits of state responsibility for private infrastructure.
