Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Oral Health Access topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee amends dental access bill to add study of provider compensation, insurer networks and patient costs

2246609 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Human Services Committee amended HB 15‑67 to add a directed study of dental compensation, insurer participation and patient out‑of‑pocket costs to inform future steps on rotations and access.

Committee members amended House Bill 15‑67 to add several requested study topics after hearing testimony about dental workforce shortages and access gaps on tribal lands and in rural communities.

What changed

Representative (testimony sponsor) offered language added to the study portion of the bill to require the interim review to examine: compensation for dental professionals in North Dakota compared with other states; cost and profit margins for dental providers; dental‑provider participation in major dental insurer networks (in‑network vs. out‑of‑network percentages); and covered charges versus typical out‑of‑pocket costs for patients. The amendment was introduced after the sponsor said testimony showed provider pay, insurer participation and patient costs as major barriers to expanding clinical rotations and access.

Why it matters

Witnesses told the committee North Dakota faces a shortage of dentists and dental professionals and that patients in rural areas and on reservations often lack routine dental care. Supporters framed the measure as a staged approach: gather data, identify systemic barriers, then structure incentives and pilot rotations to bring providers and clinical training into underserved areas. Representative Davis said testimony cited a need for 1,000–2,000 dental positions statewide, framing the workforce shortfall as large and persistent.

Committee action

The committee adopted the amendment on a voice vote. A motion for a do‑pass recommendation followed; the excerpt shows a motion and second recorded and discussion but does not include the final roll call in the excerpt provided.

Ending

Committee members asked for further detail on how rotations would be structured and requested follow‑up materials; the amendment directs the study to gather comparative data that legislators said would be used to design targeted policies and potential incentives to increase provider participation in underserved communities.