Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents press Crook County for clearer enforcement of conditional-use permits at Woodward site

2246080 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents called on the county to do more to monitor and enforce conditional-use permits (CUPs), citing opaque reporting and unanswered questions about dust-management plans and vehicle inspections at the Woodward site.

Several residents urged Crook County officials during public comment to clarify how the county enforces conditions attached to conditional-use permits (CUPs), using the Woodward mining site as a specific example.

Adam Mikulski asked whether the county has a process to follow up on CUP requirements or if enforcement relies primarily on citizen complaints. “Do we ask the question? Do we go to the county, or do they look up what it is?” Mikulski asked, noting concerns about vehicle inspections, oil drips and water use at the Woodward site.

John Eisler (county staff) and county managers responded that enforcement depends on the specific condition: some CUPs require periodic reports or state permits to be filed and the county can request those records. Eisler said county staff has been in “pretty frequent contact with Knife River” and would review recent complaints. He added, “We do rely on citizen complaints for a lot of this stuff. But, there's a process in the CUP either through reports or through communication to get that information.”

Commissioners and staff said some aspects of compliance, especially environmental and water-use issues, fall under state agencies such as the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) or the Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI). Commissioner Crawford said he had asked DEQ for a checklist distinguishing state violations from nonviolations and would share that guidance when it arrives: “As soon as he gets that to me, I'm gonna send it out to all the people that emailed in so people will know…what to look for.”

Resident Josephine (Grama) Mikulski noted the 2015 CUP for the Woodward site includes a requirement that “the applicant shall submit a dust management plan to and obtain the required permits from the appropriate state agency,” and asked whether the county holds a copy. Eisler said the county has DEQ and DOGAMI permits on file and will check whether the dust-management plan was submitted in 2015.

Commissioners acknowledged frustration from residents about slow responses and repeated complaints, but said staff is actively reviewing recent reports and will form a response. County staff asked residents to follow up in two weeks for an update.

No formal action was taken; the discussion occurred during the public-comment portion of the meeting.