Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Healthcare Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves supplemental appropriation for Health Care Policy and Financing amid debate over forecasting and oversight
Summary
On Feb. 6 the Colorado Senate passed Senate Bill 93, a supplemental appropriation for the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, after extended debate about forecasting errors, spending growth and demands for increased accountability.
The Colorado Senate on Feb. 6 approved Senate Bill 93, a supplemental appropriation for the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, on third reading by a vote of 23 ayes to 8 no, with four excused.
Lawmakers said the funding was needed to maintain Medicaid and other programs but used the debate to press the department on budgeting and forecasting practices. Senator Marchman, who spoke in favor, said the department serves "over 1,700,000 Coloradans" and warned that shortfalls would harm patients and providers. "When hiccup underestimates growth, they run out of funding," Marchman said, adding that repeated forecasting errors amount to "a systemic failure."
Opponents said past forecasting and spending growth are the real problem. Senator Pelton B told colleagues, "I am not going to vote for this today because I don't think they need any more money. ... I ask for a no vote on Senate Bill 93." The chamber's minority leader also opposed the bill, characterizing the request as a remediation of forecasting errors and citing figures he described on the floor: "$87,000,000 in general fund obligation loan, $360,000,000 across all sources of funding," which he said reflected the scope of the agency's shortfall.
Supporters framed the vote as necessary to avoid service interruptions while demanding better oversight going forward. Marchman said the funding request should be viewed as an investment that "must be managed responsibly," and called for "regular reporting from HCPF on spending, provider access, and efficiency improvements." Other senators who spoke during debate said they expect follow-up reporting and corrective measures instead of repeated emergency requests.
The motion for final passage was moved on the floor and the bill passed 23-8, with four excused. Several senators were recorded by the clerk as voting no during the roll call sequence, including Senator Lundin, Senator Pelton R., Senator Carson, Senator Bazely, Senator Rich and Senator Catlin; the complete roster of no votes was reflected in the 8-member no tally recorded by the clerk.
Senate Bill 93 will move forward consistent with the enacted supplemental appropriation process; speakers on both sides emphasized further oversight and forecasting reforms as a condition for future support.
