Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rv Shows topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Worcester County, promoters and tourism groups back allowing out‑of‑state RV dealers to display at Ocean City shows
Summary
Delegate Wayne Hartman told the committee House Bill 163 would permit out‑of‑state RV dealers to display—but not sell—motorhomes at RV shows in Worcester County to grow tourism and broaden consumer choices.
Get email alerts on the Rv Shows topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Delegate Wayne Hartman presented House Bill 163 to the House Environment and Transportation Committee on Feb. 6 to authorize out‑of‑state motorhome and recreational vehicle dealers to display—but not execute buyer’s orders or accept deposits—at RV shows in Worcester County.
"House Bill 163 is designed to allow out of state RV dealers to participate in RV shows located in Worcester County, Maryland. Out of state RV dealers may not execute a buyer's order or accept a deposit. This will simply allow those dealers to display only," Delegate Hartman told the committee.
Proponents included Richard Hutchins, promoter of the Ocean City RV Show, and Jennifer Evans, co‑promoter. Hutchins told the committee the event had attracted attendees from more than 15 states and that allowing more brands to be displayed would boost attendance and benefit Maryland dealers by drawing more potential customers. Melanie Purcell, director of tourism and economic development for Worcester County, said the show supports shoulder‑season tourism in a county that draws large visitor numbers and generates significant visitor spending.
Matt Liber of the Maryland Tourism Coalition described the policy as tourism and economic development: "These are people that as, the previous panel has talked about, they're coming from 15 states. That's putting money from other states into our economy." Matt Liber and Worcester officials argued the change would help Ocean City Convention Center and local businesses.
Ocean City city officials and promoters emphasized the local, limited scope of the bill and said language had been adjusted since last year's vetoed statewide proposal; Delegate Hartman said the governor's office had signaled support for the revised, local bill. Supporters added a registration and bond requirement for out‑of‑state dealers to address consumer protection concerns.
Opponents included the Maryland RV Dealers Association, represented by Bernie Marzak of Cornerstone Government Affairs, who said Maryland dealers—seven businesses employing roughly 300 people statewide—believe out‑of‑state displays would hurt in‑state dealers by drawing sales away. He noted the governor had vetoed a prior statewide version and dealers remained concerned this change would benefit out‑of‑state businesses and reduce Maryland dealers’ sales.
Committee members asked about the number of shows in Maryland, reciprocity with other states, and whether Maryland dealers already sell at out‑of‑state shows. Proponents told the committee the Ocean City show was distinct from the Timonium show and argued the bill will grow visitation and generate tax revenue for Worcester County. Opponents asked the committee to issue an unfavorable report.
Ending: The hearing record shows robust testimony on both sides; the committee concluded the bill hearing after questions and exchange.

