Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conservation Easements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conservation commission to draft standard placard and easement language for future conservation easements
Summary
Commissioners agreed to draft boilerplate language and a placard standard for future conservation easements and to form a small working group to present a recommended template to legal staff and the commission.
Get email alerts on the Conservation Easements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners discussed a proposal to create standard easement language and a placard specification to make it easier to mark and maintain conservation easement boundaries. The working idea is a boilerplate provision granting the grantee the right to install and maintain boundary markers with defined size and spacing, and to require maintenance obligations in the easement document.
Sean (commissioner) presented sample language drawn from three recent easements and said a consistent insertion could give the commission and easement stewards clearer authority to install placards. As an example of draft wording he offered: “Grantee may affix or maintain markers at boundary to define property limits. A marker size shall not exceed 5 inches and markers shall be separated from one another by not less than 40 feet,” while noting the final dimensions and spacing would be adjustable based on legal review and site specifics.
Commissioners discussed multiple approaches: (1) adopt a nonbinding template the commission will recommend when reviewing future easement proposals; (2) include standardized language in new easement deeds drafted by legal counsel; or (3) pursue bylaw changes that would codify a requirement (noting codification would likely require additional city approvals and a larger procedural lift).
Several commissioners said flexibility is important. Commissioners asked that proposed language allow “may” rather than “shall” in limited cases to preserve the ability to adapt to site constraints; the group also asked for a clear schematic for signage (size, color, sample text) to reduce debate at hearings. The commission agreed to form a small subcommittee to produce proposed text and a graphic placard spec to present to the commission and the city solicitor for review.
Commissioners John and Sean volunteered to work with staff to draft the template and circulate it before the next meeting. The draft will be reviewed with the city solicitor’s office to ensure it is compatible with deed language and any municipal review processes.
No formal vote was taken; commissioners asked staff to place a draft template on a future agenda for adoption or further revision.
