Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Superintendent Evaluation Strategic Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board to use existing evaluation tool this cycle, pursue strategic-plan process later
Summary
The board discussed timing and method for the superintendent's annual evaluation and debated linking it to a district strategic plan. Members agreed to proceed with the existing evaluation instrument for February and to pursue strategic planning and a possible revised evaluation framework later in the year.
Board members debated how to time and structure the annual evaluation of Superintendent Miss Ventura and whether it should be tied to a district strategic plan.
Several members argued a strategic plan with measurable goals would improve the evaluation's usefulness. Ms. Stevenson urged development of a multi-year strategic plan and said the superintendent's performance goals should derive from that plan. "We are actually supposed to put together a strategic plan that has goals and objectives that tie in with the superintendent's evaluation," she said.
Other members noted the timing constraints of budget season and suggested using the existing evaluation tool for the upcoming cycle while the district develops a strategic plan and a possibly revised evaluation instrument. Mr. Carter and Mr. Moore recommended doing the current evaluation in February as required by board policy, then working on more robust strategic planning and evaluation tools over the summer so future assessments align with measurable goals.
The board agreed to keep the evaluation tool on the February agenda as a voting item; the chair asked members to complete and return their individual evaluations after approval so the results can be compiled for a February work-session presentation. The chair said he would collect completed forms and present a composite in the March meeting if the timeline holds.
Why it matters: An evaluation tied to measurable district goals and a strategic plan would give the board a clearer basis for assessing superintendent performance; timing must be balanced with legal policy and budget calendars.
What comes next: The board will approve the existing instrument at the next meeting, members will complete and return evaluations for compilation, and staff will explore strategic-planning support for a future, more outcome-driven evaluation process.
