Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultant outlines U.S. roles for aircraft noise; emissions and legislative options raised by public and supervisors
Summary
HMMH consultant Jean Rendell reviewed established U.S. roles for aircraft noise management — FAA (source control, ATC, funding), state/local (land use), operators (scheduling) — and roundtable members and public speakers urged congressional engagement and raised emissions concerns.
A consultant briefed the roundtable on U.S. roles and responsibilities for aircraft noise on Feb. 5, explaining that federal responsibility centers on source emissions, air‑traffic control and funding for noise abatement, while state and local governments are responsible for land‑use control and compatibility.
Jean Rendell of HMMH told members that the FAA’s 1976 Noise Abatement Policy remains the reference point for roles and responsibilities and that the agency has been working on a policy update for several years. Rendell said aircraft operators control schedules and fleet decisions, airports plan and implement voluntary noise-abatement measures, and local jurisdictions have the authority to manage land use around airports.
Why it matters: Understanding which level of government controls land use, operations and mitigation funding helps communities target advocacy and practical measures. Roundtables serve to bring communities together so that any changes do not simply shift noise from one neighborhood to another without consent.
Public comments and legislative advocacy During public comment, Anne Schneider urged the roundtable to consider air emissions in addition to noise, saying FAA handles noise while EPA handles emissions and California Air Resources Board issues do not always apply to airports. She said Millbrae and San Bruno face elevated particulate pollution and referenced federal environmental justice guidance.
Supervisor Spear urged the roundtable to ask congressional offices to attend future meetings and to keep reintroducing bills that aim to give noise and health greater weight in FAA reauthorization. Darlene Yapley (on Zoom) said congressional reauthorization can change what the FAA is required to do and urged continued advocacy.
What members asked Members and staff discussed the limits of airport authority over operator schedules, the FAA policy against shifting noise without community agreement, and the roundtable’s charter and bylaws. Rendell recommended periodic bylaw reviews and emphasized the roundtable’s role as a community forum to identify practical solutions.
Next steps Members discussed inviting congressional staff to future meetings to maintain a direct conduit to federal lawmakers and to continue engaging FAA staff on policy changes. The scheduled FAA briefing about a powered‑lift (air‑taxi) rule was postponed and will be rescheduled.
