Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wayfinding Bridge Artwork topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Englewood commission reviews bridge gateway designs, warns permits will require CDOT and railroad approvals
Summary
The Englewood Cultural Arts Commission reviewed proposed artwork designs for three Santa Fe Street bridge gateways and heard staff say the city does not own the bridges, meaning art installs will require CDOT, railroad and possibly RTD permits; the group favored a cohesive look and discussed vinyl wraps, paint, colors and accessibility.
The Englewood City Cultural Arts Commission on Tuesday reviewed proposed artwork concepts for three bridge gateways on Santa Fe Street and was told the city does not own the bridges, so installations will require permitting from the Colorado Department of Transportation and the railroad and possibly RTD.
The commission’s communications director, Chris Harguth, gave an update and said, “we do not own the bridges, which is going to probably complicate, the permitting a little bit,” and that staff will pursue permits now while weather delays installations.
Why it matters: the three gateway sites — Dartmouth & Santa Fe, Hamden & Santa Fe and Oxford & Santa Fe — are major entry points to Englewood and the commission framed the artwork as a wayfinding and placemaking statement tied to the city’s Wayfinding and Placemaking Master Plan. Because CDOT requires a completed design as part of its permit review, staff asked the commission to narrow design choices now.
Commissioners and staff discussed whether all three gateways should share a common visual “through line” or be unique. Staff said the motifs can be adapted across locations and noted one regulatory constraint: CDOT review is strict about color choices near traffic signals. “They don't wanna see anything behind traffic lights that would be green or red,” a staff member said during the presentation.
Staff presented three implementation approaches: painted murals (more permanent but more expensive), vinyl wraps (cheaper with a 5–7 year lifespan according to vendors), and other fabricated signage. Staff cautioned that CDOT has raised concerns about vinyl falling into traffic and said they would collect vendor case studies to address that question.
Accessibility and color vision concerns also came up. A commissioner asked whether designs include high-contrast options for people with color-vision deficiencies; staff said they would preview designs under a color-blind lens and consider high-contrast alternatives.
Budget and timing: staff said a painted installation would be costlier and might not be budgeted to do all three bridges in a single year, while wraps would be more affordable and could allow more frequent refreshes. Staff recommended beginning with the smallest site, Oxford, to test materials and processes before scaling up.
Direction given: commissioners indicated a preference for a cohesive visual relationship among the three gateways and asked staff to circulate the selection form and additional information after the meeting so commissioners could rank favorites. Staff said they would pursue permitting information from CDOT and the railroad and follow up with the commission by survey.
The commission’s discussion also reiterated that the bridge artwork recommendation originated in the city’s Wayfinding and Placemaking Master Plan, adopted previously by the City Council.
Looking ahead: staff will collect vendor examples, confirm allowable materials and colors with CDOT, and distribute a post‑meeting voting link so commissioners can record design preferences for Oxford first and then the larger sites.
