Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Lawmakers hear competing views on extended‑warranty bill aimed at preventing sales of ineligible coverage
Summary
House Bill 27‑09 would prohibit a warrantor from accepting a fee for an extended warranty unless the warrantor knows the vehicle qualifies for coverage. Dealer representatives sought legislative conversation to identify practical solutions; the Service Contract Industry Council opposed the bill as redundant and ambiguous and urged enforcement of
House Bill 27‑09, introduced for a Feb. 4 Commerce and Consumer Protection hearing, would prohibit a warrantor from accepting a fee for an extended warranty unless the warrantor knows the motor vehicle qualifies for coverage under that warranty.
Daryl Fuller of the Oregon Vehicle Dealers Association said dealers brought the issue to the legislature to spark a broader conversation about situations in which customers buy extended warranties that later prove ineligible for coverage because of vehicle…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
