Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
East Lansing delays business‑license fee changes after councilors seek more data on police responses and staffing
Summary
The City Council voted unanimously Feb. 4 to defer proposed amendments to business license fees for entertainment and restaurant categories until March 4 to gather additional input from downtown businesses and refine a proposal to bill certain entertainment businesses for actual police response costs.
At its Feb. 4 meeting the East Lansing City Council voted unanimously to defer consideration of amendments to business license fees for amusement/video arcade, dance hall, entertainment, restaurant, and takeout stores and to defer repeal of an existing moratorium. The council moved the item to the March 4, 2025 business meeting to allow staff to gather more feedback from downtown hospitality stakeholders and refine proposed billing definitions.
City Manager staff told council the revised approach would, for certain entertainment businesses (primarily downtown bars), allow the city to bill for “actual police response” when officers are dispatched for incidents such as fights, noise violations or assaults. The manager said the concept is modeled on fire‑department billing practices for repeated false or preventable alarms and that the administration wants to clearly define what types of police responses would be billable and which would be considered baseline public safety services.
Council members requested additional data and context before taking action, including: the period covered by the calls‑for‑service dataset (staff said 2024 year‑to‑date), a breakdown of calls to specific downtown businesses (the packet later showed Harbors had 103 calls in 2024, Lou & Harry’s 51, and Fieldhouse and Riviera Café 40 each), whether other nearby jurisdictions (Meridian Township/Okemos) were included for competitive comparison, and how many police vacancies the department currently has (staff said the department had about 5–7 vacancies out of 47 positions).
Council member Meadows moved to defer the item to March 4 to allow staff time to refine billable definitions and solicit hospitality‑industry feedback; the motion was seconded and passed unanimously by voice vote.
City staff said they had circulated the revised recommendation to downtown hospitality representatives earlier the same day and apologized for the late notice. The manager asked for additional time to clarify the methodology, including which specific responses (fights, assaults, noise complaints tied to licensed establishments) would trigger billing and what would remain a city‑provided baseline service.
The item will return to council on March 4 with additional stakeholder input and a more detailed draft of billable events and fee mechanics.
