Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Downtown Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

East Lansing council probes Field House expansion, pizza shop plans amid capacity and policing concerns

2236317 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Feb. 4, 2025 East Lansing City Council meeting, the council held a public hearing and extended discussion on a special‑use request from 213 Ann Street Inc. to expand the Field House sports bar into adjacent Suite B with alcohol service and to convert Suite C into a pizza shop without alcohol service.

At the Feb. 4, 2025 East Lansing City Council meeting, the council held a public hearing and extended discussion on a special‑use request from 213 Ann Street Inc. to expand the Field House sports bar into adjacent Suite B with alcohol service and to convert vacant Suite C into a pizza shop without alcohol service. The planning department noted the planning commission recommended approval on Dec. 1, 2024, and the Downtown Development Authority recommended approval on Nov. 21, 2024.

The request, as presented by Alicia Wright of the planning department, would expand Field House seating by 50 (bringing the field‑house total to 196 by staff calculation) and add a 43‑seat pizza shop, for a combined seated total of 239 patrons; the applicant also seeks to retain an existing 330 standing‑room capacity that was approved previously. Wright told council the pizza shop hours include a proposed closing of 3 a.m. and that the project shares a kitchen footprint in the existing building.

The proposal drew repeated questions from council about how the suites will connect, who can move between spaces, how a retained 330 standing‑room allowance would be used, and how the city would enforce limiting alcohol service to specified suites. Council members asked for clearer floor plans, an orientation map and a written list of proposed conditions before the item returns for final action.

Micah Siegel, legal counsel for 213 Ann Street, said the expansion “is to expand our private event capability” and described Suite B’s additional seating as intended primarily for private events and catered gatherings. “This is exactly the kind of business that we should be trying to attract as a community,” Siegel said. Jason Bamford, a partner in the proposed pizza operation, said the side‑piece restaurant is “to accommodate a cleaner dining space for people that wanna come in” and that the pizza shop will be a separate, primarily dining‑focused business without alcohol service.

Council members pressed the applicants on enforcement and operational details. Council member Meadows said he would not support restoring or granting the full 330‑person occupancy without a clearly enforceable condition limiting the ways that capacity can be used: “I'm not going to be voting to give you 3 30 seats,” he said. Meadows and others asked for a specific condition stating that Suite C (the pizza shop) remain alcohol‑free and for a reliable mechanism to control flow between suites on weekends and game days.

Council members and staff also raised questions about public‑safety impacts downtown. Council member Aldman noted police calls ranking data that later appeared in the meeting packet and asked for context on how this establishment's calls for service compare to other downtown businesses.

Staff and the applicants said the project will improve internal circulation and security controls, including locking the door between suites at 9 p.m. and providing security as needed, and that shared circulation will be reconfigured to better control egress and flow. Siegel said an elevator serves Suite A (the Field House upstairs and the Second Floor event space) and that the newly configured Suite B would be used largely for private events and catering for institutional clients.

Council closed the public hearing but did not take a final vote on the special‑use request. Staff were asked to work with the applicant to provide clearer, corrected drawings (council members noted an apparent north‑arrow/orientation error in the plans), a labeled, exploded diagram of suites and a draft of potential conditions (including any limits on the 330 standing‑room allowance and a clear prohibition on alcohol in Suite C) for council consideration at a future business meeting.

The council requested additional information before final action: a clearer depiction of suite layouts and circulation; a written condition defining allowed uses for Suite B events versus routine overflow; confirmation of which legal entity holds the SDM (specialty designated merchant) license; and explicit language to ensure Suite C will remain alcohol free. Planning staff noted the existing certificate of occupancy history and that the packet includes prior floor plans, which staff will clarify.

The matter will return to a future business meeting with revised drawings and proposed conditions for a final vote.