Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rural Technical Advisory Committee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
GWRC proposes rural technical advisory committee for Caroline and King George; committee backs plan
Summary
Regional GWRC staff proposed a quarterly rural Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for Caroline and King George counties to improve coordination with VDOT and boost rural project development; the Caroline County Transportation Committee voted its support.
The Caroline County Transportation Committee on Tuesday heard a proposal from GWRC staff to form a standing rural Technical Advisory Committee serving Caroline and King George counties and voted to support the plan.
GWRC staff described the committee as a quarterly forum that would give rural staff direct, recurring access to VDOT and regional technical resources and better align the counties’ project pipelines with regional and state funding programs. Committee members said the group could help produce higher‑quality SmartScale, TAP and Safe Routes to School applications.
GWRC staff member Carrie Eaves said the committee “would provide a forum for you to regularly communicate and collaborate with VDOT,” and urged local staff and supervisors to review the draft bylaws before meetings begin in late spring. GWRC transportation staff Ian (last name not specified in the record) told the committee the group is intended to carry out tasks already in the GWRC Rural Work Program, including statewide planning assistance and local/regional analysis.
Committee members discussed structure and membership. GWRC proposed two staff representatives from each county, local VDOT members (the presentation named David Beal and Kyle Bateson), a GWRC staff liaison and additional members recommended by staff. Meetings would be quarterly and could alternate between the two counties to ease travel and local engagement.
Members noted VDOT’s expressed support during the presentation and urged their boards of supervisors to affirm support so GWRC can finalize bylaws. The committee established consensus in favor of the proposal; a motion “that this committee support the proposed rural transportation board between Caroline and King George County” was made and approved by voice vote.
The discussion also touched on outreach: GWRC said it will circulate the full slide deck to committee members and build the committee’s agenda packets into the Rural Work Program for greater transparency to each county’s board.
Less formal points raised during the discussion included whether Caroline and King George should seek formal voting membership on the larger MPO technical committee (which some members said historically focused on urban projects), and how a new rural TAC might reduce that gap.
Next steps: GWRC will take committee comments, prepare draft bylaws and return to the committee for follow‑up; if supported by both counties’ boards, the group expects to begin meetings in late spring.
