Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage Judicial Ditch 6 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pine County joins with neighboring counties to form joint drainage authority for Judicial Ditch 6
Summary
The county approved a resolution to establish a joint drainage authority for Judicial Ditch 6 with Isanti and Kanabec counties, allowing the authority to levy assessments for maintenance or improvements. Commissioners and staff discussed an impoundment on private property and a pending inspection.
The Pine County Board approved a resolution to form a joint drainage authority for Judicial Ditch 6 that will operate under Minnesota drainage statutes and include representatives from Isanti and Kanabec counties.
County staff described the county’s portion of Judicial Ditch 6 as small and located in Royalton Township in the county’s southwest corner. The resolution would create a multi-county drainage authority with members apportioned from the involved counties; Pine County will be represented on that authority by a commissioner previously appointed by the board.
Mark (staff member) told commissioners the ditch system dates to the early 1900s in many places and that much of the county’s ditch network now serves recreational as well as historic agricultural parcels. He said Pine County has seven other ditches and that most are not in active agricultural use. The staff presentation noted one local impoundment on property identified in the discussion as belonging to the Swanson family; the county’s drainage inspector has been in contact with the property owner while investigators determine whether a permit was issued for the impoundment.
Commissioners discussed the history of judicial ditches, their original agricultural purpose and the mix of current uses (recreation, seasonal water management and limited haying). Staff said the joint authority would have the usual powers under drainage law, including levying assessments on benefited properties to pay for maintenance or improvements.
The board approved the resolution by roll-call vote after a motion by Commissioner Ludwig and a second by Commissioner Steve Holland, and staff noted the authority could levy assessments on benefiting properties if maintenance or improvement is undertaken.
Why it matters: Establishing the joint drainage authority sets the legal framework for cost-recovery assessments and formal management of a drainage system that affects private land and local roads. The impoundment under investigation may affect a nearby resident’s property and downstream flow, staff said.
What’s next: The county’s drainage inspector will continue the inquiry into whether the impoundment was permitted; the new joint authority will be able to schedule maintenance or improvement actions and assess benefiting properties under state drainage law.
