Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Works Supplies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Findlay City Council adopts road-salt accounting ordinance after debate
Summary
Council adopted Ordinance 20-25-12 establishing how the city accounts for and provides road salt to Findlay City Schools after a divided vote and public debate about whether the city should supply salt to outside entities.
Get email alerts on the Public Works Supplies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Findlay City Council voted to adopt Ordinance 20-25-12 on Feb. 4, 2025, establishing the use and monetary accounting of road salt between the City of Findlay and the Findlay City Schools. The measure passed after the council moved to reconsider the item and then gave it final reading.
Supporters said the ordinance codifies an existing, long-running practice and clarifies accounting and public-purpose limits for a shared supply arrangement. Council member Niemeyer moved to reconsider and Council member Palmer moved to adopt the replacement ordinance; Niemeyer seconded the adoption motion. Opponents said the city should not be in the business of supplying salt to other public or private entities.
The dispute centered on two points: whether the city has authority or should create a mechanism to provide city-purchased salt to the school district, and how to account for and replace salt used by the schools. Council member Frisci argued against the ordinance, saying the city is not supposed to resell or otherwise put its materials into the hands of others and that the arrangement could become “messy.” The mayor and administration officials replied that the policy would reduce unnecessary duplication and expense, that staff and the auditor had tightened accounting, and that the ordinance memorializes a long-term practice and public-purpose rationale.
Legal counsel on the meeting said the ordinance preserves and documents the city’s accounting and public-purpose considerations for the arrangement; the counsel’s written opinion was described during the debate. After discussion, the council adopted the ordinance. The roll call recorded multiple ayes and one recorded nay by Council Member Frisci; the ordinance was adopted as the replacement ordinance.
The ordinance instructs staff to use the revised Exhibit A (replacement provided at the meeting) and directs the city’s finance and service-safety offices to follow the new accounting steps when providing and replenishing road salt to the school district. No implementation timeline was read into the record at adoption.
Council members who spoke on the record during the debate included Council Member Niemeyer, Council Member Palmer, Council Member Frisci, Mayor Murn and a city staff member who provided the legal/accounting perspective.
The council did not adopt any additional, separate policy changes for other non-school entities during the vote; the action addressed the documented relationship with Findlay City Schools only.

