Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civic Campus Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Northglenn asks staff to study expanded City Hall parking lot; NURA bond surplus cited as funding source
Summary
The city manager presented plans to expand a proposed 20-space lot to roughly 200 additional spaces as part of the Civic Campus project, citing roughly $1.3 million in available NURA bond proceeds; council favored a temporary, lower-cost option and asked staff to return with cost comparisons and design options.
The city manager updated the council on the next phase of the Civic Campus and City Hall redevelopment and asked whether council wanted staff to explore expanding a previously planned 20-space parking lot between the new City Hall footprint and the former recreation center site.
City staff told council that demolition of the old City Hall is scheduled after the request-for-proposals process and that demolition could begin in April if procurement proceeds on schedule. The manager said available bond proceeds from a 2019 NURA bond issuance—boosted by an $800,000 premium on the bonds and savings on earlier infrastructure work—left about $1.3 million available for site infrastructure. Staff presented an illustrative option to expand the small lot to add roughly 200 spaces, and estimated the expansion as a roughly $1.5 million–$2.0 million project in its current, high-level form.
Councilmembers expressed unanimous interest in adding parking capacity but raised questions about permanence, landscaping and future development opportunities. Council member Goff said a large continuous asphalt field would feel like a “wasteland” and recommended added landscaping and amenities or a design that preserves future development options. Council member Nowicki asked staff to show temporary versus permanent configurations; multiple councilmembers suggested a more temporary asphalt solution to preserve development flexibility. Council member Burns expressed concern about spending money on permanent infrastructure before the city finalizes long-term plans for the site.
Staff said the preferred near-term approach is to price a temporary version of the expanded lot (baseline, functional asphalt with minimal amenities) and a more permanent, landscaped version and return to council with estimates and comparisons. The manager noted other remediation and north-side work on the site and said the authority that issued the bonds expects an assertive effort to spend surplus proceeds before the end of the year.
Direction and next steps: staff will return with cost estimates for a temporary parking-lot solution and at least one more finished option, present comparisons of temporary versus permanent infrastructure and provide a schedule tied to the demolition procurement and brownfields remediation. No formal appropriation or vote was taken; council offered consensus direction to pursue pricing and return with options.
