Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sidewalk Snow Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

St. Francis residents, council debate snow-removal enforcement after city clears sidewalks

2228646 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents and council members debated enforcement of St. Francis’s sidewalk snow-removal ordinance after staff cleared sidewalks days after a light snowfall; city officials said no citations were issued, only invoices for partial reimbursement.

Trish Weimer, a St. Francis resident, told the Common Council she was "shocked" by the city's response after a recent light snowfall and said she "didn't like the way the whole thing was done." She said neighbors typically help one another and that she had not received a ticket.

The dispute centered on St. Francis’s sidewalk snow-removal requirements and how the city enforces them. City staff and several Aldermen said the city has an ordinance requiring property owners to clear sidewalks within 24 hours; staff ultimately waited almost 72 hours before using city equipment to clear sidewalks and then sent invoices seeking partial reimbursement for the work. City officials said no one received citations or fines.

The discussion matters because the ordinance is intended to maintain safe pedestrian passage, particularly for older residents and people using mobility devices. Council members and emergency personnel said even a light accumulation can cause serious injuries and that enforcement aims to prevent falls and related medical emergencies.

At public comment, Trish Weimer of 3756 East Waterford Place said the response felt excessive given the small amount of snow and asked who decided to clear the sidewalks and issue charges. Another resident, Rick (address given as 402 South Nicholson Avenue), said members of the public had called the city with complaints about icy sidewalks and emphasized that council members receive many such reports.

A city staff member clarified that the action taken was not a fine or citation but invoices seeking partial reimbursement for the time and equipment used to clear the sidewalks. The staff member told the council that state statute and the city ordinance permit the city to clear sidewalks and charge for the work, and that in this instance the city waited almost 72 hours before taking action. Alderman Matt said the council tolerated the longer wait but emphasized the 24-hour rule in the ordinance and urged better public communication next season.

Other council members and emergency staff stressed the public-safety rationale: Alderman Sean, who said he and another council member work in health care, noted that "the half-inch snowfall is the most frequent snowfall to injure people" and that failing to clear sidewalks puts elderly residents at risk.

Council members acknowledged frustration among residents and promised to improve communication about the ordinance and enforcement procedures. No formal change to the ordinance or an enforcement policy was adopted during the meeting.

Additional context: council members said the ordinance has been in effect for many years and was last amended in 2008. Officials also said the city reduced the usual charge in these cases and billed only for partial reimbursement of costs rather than issuing the higher, standard charge.