Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Insurance Statute Reorganization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legislative counsel presents S.30 to reorganize Vermont health insurance statutes
Summary
Dan Harvey, legislative counsel, told the Legislative Council that S.30 would reorganize and renumber 8 V.S.A. chapter 107, add consistent definitions and make conforming cross‑reference changes but is intended to make no substantive policy changes.
Dan Harvey, legislative counsel with the Office of Legislative Council, told the Legislative Council that S.30 is “an act related to updating and organizing the health insurance statutes in 8 V.S.A. chapter 107,” and that the bill’s intent is not to introduce substantive policy changes but to reorganize and clarify existing law.
Harvey said the bill is lengthy — “It is 180 pages” — because it repeals the current chapter numbering and reenacts the material under a new, more logical structure. The proposal adds a single, chapter‑wide definition section (including terms such as “health insurance plan,” “health insurer” and “major medical insurance”), cleans up inconsistent language and removes archaic legalese where possible while leaving certain long‑standing contract provisions unchanged to avoid unintended consequences for insurers’ contracts.
The bill also includes implementation provisions and transitional language intended to limit disruption after renumbering. Harvey described two specific implementation sections that direct publishers and agencies to update cross references when the Vermont Statutes Annotated are republished, and an interpretation provision that makes the technical renumbering subordinate to any substantive changes enacted in the same biennium. He told the committee that rules, orders, bulletins, forms and guidance from the Department of Financial Regulation and the Green Mountain Care Board that refer to the existing numbering would remain valid until agencies could amend them to reflect the new numbering.
Harvey said he worked closely with the Department of Financial Regulation on the drafting and circulated a marked‑up version to insurers, the Health Care Advocate, provider groups and other stakeholders. He reported receiving only limited feedback from stakeholders and encouraged anyone who thought the reorganization had altered substantive law to raise those concerns. A committee member reiterated that the goal was technical reorganization, saying, in part, “there’s no new policy in the … there is the intent is no new policy.”
Harvey noted the bill contains conforming revisions to other statutes to address cross‑references and that some practical details — including whether agencies will wholesale‑update rules to reflect the new numbering or update them piecemeal as they are revised — will proceed through the normal rulemaking processes, including review by the Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules (LCAR).
The committee discussed next steps for review and testimony; Harvey said staff had prepared a markup and could present crib notes for members. He indicated the bill has been circulated for comment and that staff would pursue stakeholder testimony as needed. The committee also flagged a separate, time‑sensitive agenda item on merging the group markets that is expected to affect the Green Mountain Care Board’s upcoming rate submissions.
The bill was introduced for committee consideration; no formal vote or final action on S.30 was recorded during the meeting.
