Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses superintendent evaluation rubric; plans short-term use of existing tool
Summary
The board discussed moving forward with the district's traditional superintendent evaluation tool while exploring a new rubric; staff will follow up with facilitators and circulate templates to administrators.
Mahomet-Seymour CUSD 3 board members discussed Feb. 3 whether to adopt a new superintendent evaluation rubric or continue with the district's existing evaluation tool for the current cycle. No formal vote was taken; staff will proceed with follow-up and return recommendations.
Why it matters: The evaluation method affects how district administrators and the superintendent are scored, the timing for submitting evaluation documents and any contract-date adjustments tied to the evaluation schedule.
Discussion details: The superintendent reported receiving "positive feedback on the super eval" and said she has set a Zoom with the rubric facilitators to review options. She recommended proceeding with the district's traditional evaluation tool for this year while exploring the new rubric for future use. Board members debated whether to adopt the full new rubric next year, use portions of it as a hybrid, or retain the existing template to ensure clarity and consistency in scores.
Timing and next steps: Staff said the timeline in the new rubric points to starting the process in July or August and that contract language may need adjusting to reflect the evaluation due date. The superintendent and staff will send the rubric and current template to administrators for input, and the board will revisit the recommendation after the facilitator call.
Ending: No formal board action was taken; staff will report back after the facilitator meeting and circulate templates to administrators.
