Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals court hears child-support and attorney-fee dispute after family-court trial
Summary
Appellant argued the trial court used the wrong attributed income figure when calculating child support for a four-month period and that a $6,000 attorney-fee award was unsupported; appellee said the error is clerical and fee award was warranted by obstructive conduct at trial.
The Appeals Court heard argument in Loyosa v. Fabio (docket 24P0682), an appeal addressing a family-court child-support calculation and a post-trial award of attorney's fees.
Alan Loyosa, representing himself, argued that the trial judge used an incorrect attributed-income figure ($13.41 weekly) rather than the court's own finding of weekly earnings of $5.60 for a specific four-month period…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
