Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Voters approve steps to buy West Swanzey water system and accept state loan financing

2225618 ยท February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Swansea voters moved forward on a plan to acquire the West Swanzey Water Company, approving Article 5 (funding) and Article 12 (authority to begin the purchase process under RSA 38:4). The articles include a $6.4 million low-interest loan with 40% principal forgiveness and a $600,000 purchase price presented to the town.

Voters approved Articles 5 and 12, clearing the way for the town to pursue purchase and improvement of the West Swanzey Water Company.

Article 5 describes a $6.4 million low-interest loan program with 40% principal forgiveness to purchase and upgrade the privately owned system. The proposal said the system needs a pump house and storage tank to improve fire flow and overall capacity; supporters told voters those upgrades would enable commercial growth along Route 10. โ€œIf we're gonna go fishing for businesses, we need to make the bay is having water and soil on Route 10 especially,โ€ a supporter said, urging approval to secure grant-funded, forgivable financing.

Town officials indicated the $600,000 purchase price was โ€œpresented to usโ€ and had not yet been negotiated; a resident asked about the number. Town staff explained the valuation for the water company rests largely on water rights and permitted wells rather than the accounting statements, and that buying an existing system is significantly less costly than drilling new municipal wells. North Swanseaโ€™s larger system was cited as a comparison for operating budgets and scale.

Article 12 authorized the selectmen to begin the process to purchase the water company under RSA 38:4; meeting presenters emphasized that if the articles failed, similar forgivable funding would likely be unavailable in the near future and the matter could not be reconsidered for two years. Both articles passed (voice votes; tallies not specified in the transcript).