Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Casino Referendum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate clears bill to let Fairfax County place casino referendum; lawmakers debate economic benefits and local opposition
Summary
SB 9 82, which would let the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors put a casino referendum on the local ballot, passed the Senate after hours of floor debate that split Northern Virginia lawmakers over growth, local planning and revenue.
The Virginia Senate approved SB 9 82 on Tuesday, a bill authorizing the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors to place a local referendum asking voters whether to allow a casino and associated mixed-use development in Tysons Corner.
Senator Serval (Eastern Fairfax), sponsor of the bill, described the project offered by a developer as a large, mixed-use complex that would include a casino and a 600-room luxury hotel, a 1.5-million-square-foot development footprint, a 5,500-seat concert venue, convention exhibit space, retail and around 1,600 multifamily residences. Serval said studies estimate the project could generate about $1.2 billion in gaming revenue and produce approximately $232 million a year for the Commonwealth for school construction.
Supporters argued for local choice and potential large-scale economic development. Senator Marston, representing Fairfax, said the site sits on the Silver Line and could enhance metro ridership and economic activity near Dulles Corridor. Senator Pokarski and others noted potential revenue, job creation (sponsor cited 5,000 permanent jobs and 2,000 construction jobs) and the county’s need to diversify revenue amid budget pressures.
Opponents emphasized local planning, community opposition and potential social harms. Senator Fobola (Arlington) and others argued the proposal circumvents local land-use planning and voiced concerns about gambling-related addiction, traffic, impacts on nearby entertainment and residential areas, and national-security-related employment sensitivities in Northern Virginia. Multiple Northern Virginia delegates and civic associations from Tysons-area neighborhoods told senators they opposed the proposal. Several senators also criticized the process, noting the county’s Board of Supervisors had not endorsed a referendum and that only two of nine supervisors had taken a clear public position.
Several senators proposed alternatives or asked for higher license fees; Senator Evan (Alexandria) said a $15 million license fee was low for a project the sponsor described as likely to be the state’s most lucrative.
Action: The Senate recorded a roll-call final passage vote; the tally was 24 yes, 16 no. The bill passed and now allows the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors to place a referendum before local voters if the board chooses.
Ending: The bill authorizes a local referendum only; the board of supervisors would still have to present a question to voters and the community retains the final say. Senators signaled ongoing negotiations and local legislative oversight would continue if the county pursues a proposal.
