Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate panel approves amendments to bill setting up regional behavioral-health planning
Summary
The Senate Health and Public Affairs Committee amended and advanced Senate Bill 3, which directs the Administrative Office of the Courts to convene regional behavioral-health planning teams, adds stakeholders and an appendix of providers, and requires plans to consider language access.
Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Health and Public Affairs Committee on Wednesday approved amendments to Senate Bill 3, a measure that directs the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) to convene regional planning for behavioral-health services and to develop four‑year implementation plans.
Committee action came after sponsors and members negotiated language to broaden stakeholder participation and to require planning teams to identify service gaps and include an appendix listing behavioral‑health providers in each region. Senator Block proposed the first set of amendments and Senator Cedillo Lopez presented a secondary change; both amendments were adopted by the committee and the bill received a due‑pass recommendation.
Supporters said the changes aim to ensure that community providers, higher‑education institutions and nongovernmental organizations are invited into planning so that regions do not leave key service providers out of the process. "We wanted to make sure we got their language right," Senator Block told the committee as he described inserting behavioral‑health advocates, higher‑education institutions and nongovernmental stakeholders into the bill's stakeholder list. "...include an appendix with a list of all behavioral health service providers in the behavioral health region," he said while reading an insertion to the draft text.
Sponsor Senator Wirth characterized the amendment as "friendly" and said it was broad enough to include groups without attempting to enumerate every possible participant. The committee also added a requirement that regional plans "consider the need for language access for behavioral health services in the region," a change intended to address the state's multilingual population.
Several provider groups and advocates spoke in support during the hearing. Javier Butcher, an intern representing the New Mexico Behavioral Health Providers Association, said the association "support[s] the amendments to Senate Bill 3 and appreciate[s] the inclusive language proposed." Meredith Machin, speaking for the League of Women Voters of New Mexico and the American Association of University Women, said, "This is essential for the public health, and safety of our state." NAMI New Mexico’s Gabrielle Dietrich and other public witnesses also expressed support for including culturally and linguistically competent services.
Committee members discussed how the AOC would function as a convener and report back to the legislature and how regional metrics would be used for accountability. An AOC staffer explained the choice to position AOC as a stable convener: administrations and legislatures change, but the AOC can provide continuity for the planning process. The staffer noted that the metrics and accountability framework in the companion funding bill will be important for oversight and future appropriations.
The committee also debated the challenge of setting district‑specific metrics: "What happens in Lee County and what happens in San Juan County could be dramatically different," Senator Block said, noting that districts will set metrics appropriate to local needs. Several senators stressed the need for clear, measurable goals so appropriators can judge whether a regional plan achieved its stated outcomes before providing additional funds.
The committee voted to report the bill with a due‑pass recommendation to the next committee. The sponsors and committee members said they expect further refinement in subsequent committees, including possible additions such as CYFD involvement in the next stage of review.
Votes at a glance: the committee adopted the sponsors' amendments, adopted a language‑access amendment and voted to give the amended bill a due‑pass recommendation to the next committee.
