Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Downtown residents raise safety concerns after council staff says Main–Maplewood signal lacks warrant; streets committee to meet Feb. 18
Summary
Residents urged the council to reconsider plans to remove the traffic signal at Main and Maplewood; city staff said engineering warrants are not met and recommended a four-way stop. Council set a streets committee meeting for Feb. 18 to review concerns.
Downtown residents told the Sylvania City Council Feb. 3 they were worried about pedestrian safety after city staff said a traffic signal at Main and Maplewood did not meet current engineering warrants and is slated to be replaced by a four-way stop.
Deb Chaney, a downtown resident, told the council: "Our concern is a safety issue with removal of a stoplight at Main and Maplewood. ... We feel that it should be really reconsidered and not have that be removed." Chaney pressed the council for verification of whether the signal could be reinstalled at city expense if removed.
City staff member Mr. Shaw (presenting the project) said the intersection was reviewed under Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) traffic-signal warrant procedures. He said the project’s consultant concluded the signal was no longer warranted and the service department recommended replacement with a four-way stop. Shaw explained that if counts are close a full traffic study would be done, but for this project the consultant’s review found the signal “didn't need it.”
Council responded by offering a forum for deeper review rather than an immediate change: Council set a streets committee meeting for 6:30 p.m. Tuesday, Feb. 18, in Council Chambers to discuss the intersection and related downtown improvements. Councilmember Richardson and staff invited downtown residents to meet with staff and the project team in the interim.
Why it matters: The Main–Maplewood intersection is within Sylvania’s downtown area. Residents said they are concerned about pedestrian safety—especially during busy months—and want more information about the traffic counts and time periods used in the consultant’s review. If the City proceeds with a four-way stop, drivers and pedestrians will face a different traffic-control environment than at a signalized intersection.
What was said and what was decided: Shaw described the technical process—traffic counts, ODOT warrants, and consultant review—that led staff to recommend conversion to a four-way stop. Chaney and another downtown resident, Irene Rose, told council they would like the meeting notice and process made available publicly so interested citizens could participate. The council directed staff to post committee details on the city website and to meet with residents before or during the Feb. 18 streets committee meeting.
Next steps: Council and staff asked concerned residents to meet with Public Service staff and Mr. Shaw ahead of the committee meeting, and the Feb. 18 streets committee meeting was scheduled to allow a fuller technical and public discussion of the traffic control decision.
