Teresa, a finance staff member, told the council a single project—airport improvements including a runway reconstruction—accounts for a large share of the proposed CIP dollars and that most of that cost will be paid by external partners.

"62% of this budget, is an airport expense," Teresa said, adding that much of that cost is matched by another entity and reimbursed. She told the council the city has budgeted about $1.4 million in FY26 as the local match for elements scheduled next year; the remainder of the roughly $144 million program is expected to come from the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Guard Bureau.

Why this matters: The size of the federally backed airport work skews CIP percentages and affects how other capital priorities appear in the city's pie charts. Teresa urged the council to read the project details because the large percentage share is driven by federally reimbursed construction rather than city-only spending.

Council questions and context: Council members and staff discussed the multi-year schedule and noted the city would only carry a small portion of the cost as its match this fiscal year. Teresa said finer project-level funding allocations and the presidential budget timing will determine FY26 award amounts and that staff expects more clarity by April.

Ending: City staff plan to return with technical changes and specific grant-match schedules during the wrap-up process; Teresa stressed that while the airport figures dominate the chart, local operating and debt-service consequences remain linked to the CIP decisions.