Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Names topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
WJCC staff outline process, timeline and costs for a possible James Blair renaming
Summary
Administration reviewed Policy FFA and recommended a committee‑based process to consider renaming James Blair Middle School; timeline showed a potential committee recommendation by May 6 and final board action by May 20 if the board activates the process now.
Get email alerts on the School Names topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff presented an information item describing the process the division would follow if the board chooses to consider renaming a school, with specific timing and implementation notes tailored to James Blair Middle School.
Policy basis and committee: staff cited Policy FFA (School Names), which vests final naming authority with the school board and encourages public solicitation of name suggestions. The policy states that if a school is named for an individual, the person must have been deceased for at least 10 years. Administration recommended creating a committee composed largely of members connected to the school — students, staff, parents/guardians and residents in the attendance zone — with invited roles for others (for example, a board member).
Timeline and logistics: staff said a focused process could take three to four months: if the board launches the process immediately, a committee could deliver a final recommendation on May 6 and the board could take final action on May 20. Staff also outlined implementation costs for items such as exterior signage and gym resurfacing; some cost figures were carried over from 2018 and noted as potentially understated. Nonbinding bids could be solicited in advance so purchases could occur promptly after final action; some purchases (for example gym floor resurfacing) would occur after the school year and could fall into the next fiscal year.
Board reaction: members were divided on timing and scope. Some favored commencing a renaming committee now and preferred non‑person (location or landmark) names; others asked the administration to ensure stakeholder input from city residents given the division’s joint geography and to avoid an unduly rushed process. Members asked staff to return with a committee plan should the board decide to activate the process.

