Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Mining topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs bill to designate a Montana Mining Day; hearing draws industry and labor support

2221293 · February 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 203, to create a Montana Mining Day, drew bipartisan support at the Senate State Administration Committee. Mining industry groups, labor and conservation representatives testified in favor, emphasizing mining's historical and current economic role.

House Bill 203, sponsored in the House by Representative Curtis Schomer (House District 48), would designate a state day to recognize Montana's mining heritage and contemporary mining industry.

Representative Curtis Schomer, who said he has 19 years' experience as an underground miner, opened the bill hearing and described the proposal as “a very special bill” noting the state seal motto Oro y Plata and the industry's role in Montana history. Proponents included Matt Vincent of the Montana Mining Association, George Harris of the Montana Coal Council, Sheridan Hoyer of the Montana Chamber of Commerce, Amanda Frickle of the Montana AFL-CIO, and others who highlighted both mining's historical role and the modern industry's economic contributions.

Matt Vincent (Montana Mining Association) told the committee that mining continues to contribute to the state's economy and supports thousands of jobs; George Harris, executive director of the Montana Coal Council, provided summary figures for coal-related revenues and taxes, and called mining "a pillar of our economy." Labor representatives, including Amanda Frickle of the Montana AFL-CIO, supported the bill and emphasized mining's role in the state's organized-labor history.

Committee members asked clarifying questions about federal land access and permitting. In response, George Harris said that, to his knowledge, federal action on specific BLM land releases was still pending and tied to larger federal legislation. No opponents appeared at the hearing. During the committee's later executive action, the committee voted to concur on House Bill 203; the committee recorded a concurrence vote of 7 in favor and 2 opposed.

The committee's concurrence sends the bill to the full Senate with the committee's recommendation to concur with the House version.