Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legal Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Montana Law School seeks $1 million and $575,000 feasibility study for low-residency JD program

2221245 · February 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee reviewed a decision package asking for $1 million to develop a low-residency (digital/low-residency) Juris Doctor program at the Montana Law School, including a $575,000 feasibility-study request; OCHE said accreditation rules require a feasibility study and that the program would aim to be low-residency rather than fully online.

A decision package seeking $1 million to support development of a low-residency Juris Doctor program at the Montana Law School drew questions from the Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Education about accreditation, program delivery and the requested feasibility-study costs.

Legislative staff described the package as $1,000,000 to support a digital JD program that would focus on agricultural- and tribal-related law. Committee members asked OCHE and law-school representatives for details, especially about why the budget includes $575,000 for a feasibility study.

OCHE said accreditation standards require a feasibility study as part of program development and that the proposed model is low-residency—not fully online—meaning that students would do some intensive in-person coursework (for example, weekend or weeklong residencies) combined with remote instruction. "Accreditation is the guidepost for some of this. We can't just do it on our own; it's got to go through accreditation and accreditation requires a feasibility study be done," OCHE said.

OCHE noted the request is structured as one-time-only (OTO) funds to launch a program intended to become self-sustaining through tuition and program revenues. Members questioned the scale of the initial feasibility-study budget; OCHE said the funds would cover accredited feasibility work, faculty planning, hiring and initial course development.

Committee members asked for additional detail about the feasibility study’s scope and deliverables; OCHE said it would provide more documentation and that a successful feasibility phase would be followed by further work to staff courses and secure accreditation approval. No formal action was taken; the package remains subject to committee prioritization during executive action.