Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Real Estate Acquisition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees debate options for 105 E. Second St.; inspector review and appraisal suggested
Summary
The board discussed a potential purchase of 105 East Second Street to resolve easement and boundary issues and to explore redevelopment or public uses. Trustees asked staff to arrange at least a building inspection and to research appraisal and grant options before any purchase decision.
Get email alerts on the Real Estate Acquisition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Village staff presented options for a possible acquisition of the property at 105 East Second Street, including (1) buying the parcel to clean up easements and boundary issues, (2) acquiring the building and issuing a request for proposals for a public-oriented reuse (concepts discussed included a pavilion/public meeting space, nonprofit offices or a historical society), or (3) retaining the property as a commercial landlord until a preferred use emerges.
Staff said the owner prefers to sell the whole property rather than undertake easement cleanup work. A concept sketch in the packet imagined removing a rear building and creating a pavilion that would tie to the village-owned Depot building and nearby events such as the Wednesday farmers’ market.
Trustees raised fiscal questions and feasibility concerns: several trustees noted the building needs repairs and likely requires a fire-suppression system if reused for public occupancy; one trustee estimated that full rehabilitation could reach the mid-seven-figure range once sprinklers, roof work and other safety upgrades are included. Trustees discussed funding options, including tax-increment financing (TIF), but several said they would be cautious about using TIF dollars for a public-space purchase that would not grow the tax base.
Requested next steps: trustees asked staff to (a) arrange a building-inspection walkthrough to document condition and code/suppression requirements, (b) research grant opportunities and potential funding sources, and (c) report back on appraisal costs and historic-preservation funding possibilities. One trustee suggested a professional appraisal (staff estimated similar appraisals have cost roughly $3,000–$4,000 in past projects). No purchase contract or financing decision was approved at the meeting.
Trustees emphasized they were not committing to demolition or immediate acquisition; instead, several said they wanted more technical information before any formal offer or TIF commitment.

