Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Uasi Grant Soft Targets topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs UASI grant to equip police for 'soft target' events
Summary
The committee recommended acceptance of an Urban Area Security Initiative grant to upgrade mobile command and response capabilities for large public events; MNPD described the funding as intended to improve detection, deterrence and response at concerts, parades and other crowded places.
The Public Health & Safety Committee recommended approval of an Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) grant application and acceptance to enhance Metro’s ability to detect, deter, protect and respond to attacks on soft targets and crowded places.
The resolution (RS 20 25‑1011) authorizes the Metropolitan Government, acting through the Office of Emergency Management, to accept UASI funding from the Tennessee Emergency Management Agency. The committee voted to recommend approval after questions about the use of funds and target definitions.
Why it matters: Committee members said the grant would strengthen the command, control and coordination tools used during large public events and critical incidents. Supporters said the funds would upgrade the software and equipment carried in MNPD’s mobile command units and improve rapid response at concerts, parades and other crowded gatherings.
Captain Kelly Cantrell of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department told the committee this equipment will support special‑event operations: “The command center that we're looking to use these funds to upgrade is what we utilize during special events, during critical incidents.” Cantrell listed examples of soft‑target events as “concerts, parades, our fourth of July, firework, New Year's Eve.”
Council members asked whether the grant would target specific facilities such as power infrastructure; Cantrell agreed to follow up and to meet with council members about harder targets and protective options. The committee also discussed maintaining confidentiality for critical infrastructure when considering public hearings or briefings.
The committee recorded the item as recommended for approval; the presiding member stated a committee vote of 10 in favor, 0 against, 0 not voting.
