Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the National Guard Insurance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to extend life-insurance benefits for National Guard members on Title 32 orders
Summary
House Bill 412 would extend servicemembers' group life insurance coverage to Pennsylvania National Guard members deployed to another U.S. state or territory on Title 32 orders longer than 30 days; the committee advanced the measure unanimously to the House floor.
House Bill 412, authored by Representative Hamm, was advanced unanimously by the House Committee on Veterans Affairs & Emergency Preparedness and will move to the full House. The bill would make clear that Pennsylvania National Guard members (Army or Air) who are deployed to another state or U.S. territory on Title 32 orders for more than 30 days remain eligible for the state-provided life-insurance benefit for service members and their families.
"This is a simple piece of legislation," Representative Hamm told the committee, saying the current statute covers service overseas in combat zones and state active duty orders but is silent about deployment to other states or territories on Title 32 orders. "If our Pennsylvania Army Guard or Air Guard members are deployed to another state or another US territory, for over 30 days on title 32 orders, that their life insurance will follow them," Hamm said, asking for committee support.
Representative Williams noted federal parallels and compatibility with current federal programs, stating that Servicemen's Group Life Insurance (SGLI) is available to active-duty members and Veterans' Group Life Insurance (VGLI) to retirees; bringing Guardsmen into state coverage while serving on Title 32 orders aligns with existing federal practice. Chairman Gillan and other members offered collegial support; Representative Stender moved and Representative O'Meara seconded bringing the bill up for consideration.
The committee recorded no negative votes and the bill was announced as moving unanimously to the floor. Committee discussion noted that the bill closes a statutory gap by specifying coverage during Title 32 deployments longer than 30 days; the transcript does not specify implementation details such as administrative steps, funding, or whether any retroactive coverage is intended.
Next steps: HB 412 will proceed to the full House for further consideration.
