Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Hb17 18 19 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Capital reappropriations and new requests draw scrutiny: penitentiary preservation, isotope center and State Fair projects top questions

2220014 · February 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Budget Committee members probed a wide range of capital reappropriations and new requests in House Bills 17 through 19 on March 12, zeroing in on the proposed MU isotope center, a $52 million phase to preserve the Missouri State Penitentiary and State Fair bonding proposals.

Lawmakers on the House Budget Committee moved through multiple capital and reappropriation items across House Bills 17–19 and the maintenance bill (House Bill 18) on March 12, and focused questions on project status, funding sources and long‑term operating consequences.

Top items and committee questioning - University of Missouri radioisotope science center (HB19): Committee members asked for more specifics after the governor’s recommendation included $50 million for a proposed radioisotope science center linked to MU’s research reactor. Committee members asked whether federal or private partners will match the request and asked the university to provide a complete funding and partnership plan before the committee advances the project.

- Missouri State Penitentiary preservation (HB19): The Office of Administration briefed the committee on a two‑phase preservation plan for the historic Missouri State Penitentiary (MSP) in Jefferson City. The governor recommended roughly $52 million for phase 1 (about half of a larger plan that OA estimated at nearly $100 million to preserve and reuse multiple structures). The recommendation prompted strong debate: supporters and OA staff argued a significant investment is needed to preserve historically important but deteriorating masonry structures and that certain rehabilitated buildings could be revenue‑generating via tours and events; some members opposed funding a large preservation project and questioned whether the state should subsidize an old prison, with at least one member calling such a project inappropriate.

- State Fair livestock arena and stalls (HB19): Two bonding requests to expand State Fair facilities were included in HB19 — one for a covered barn and another for additional stalling for livestock and equine competitions. OA and Department of Agriculture testimony described potential revenue from larger events and said the state would back bonds while the State Fair entity would contribute proceeds toward debt service. Committee members asked for feasibility and economic impact analyses and for bond debt‑service scenarios, and requested a written MOU documenting expected payments from State Fair revenues to offset debt service.

- Reappropriations (HB17) and maintenance (HB18): Committee members reviewed dozens of reappropriation items across agency sections — schools, higher education, DNR parks and water projects, public safety, Corrections and DMH among them. DNR staff told the committee multiple water‑infrastructure grants and park projects are underway and that seven projects have been awarded; the department agreed to provide a status update for all DNR projects listed in HB17. Members asked for an overall total of reappropriations and for disclosure of unprogrammed FMRF (Facilities Maintenance & Reserve Fund) balances used to cover overruns or emergent repairs.

- Warehouse and PPE consolidation (linked to HB20 and OA's portfolio work): The committee heard again that OA has purchased the Scruggs facility and other warehouses in Cole County to consolidate state warehouse functions (PPE storage, the print shop, fleet support). OA said consolidation will reduce annual lease costs but requires a few additional state FTE for inventory and building services. Members pressed to see where other agencies could reduce headcount or lease authority to reflect the centralization savings.

What the committee asked for Committee members asked agencies to provide: - A reconciled list of HB17 reappropriation balances and an overall total of reappropriations in the bill. - A status update for every DNR water and park project listed in HB17 (DNR agreed to provide a one‑to‑two‑day status matrix). - A funding plan and partner commitments (federal, private) for the MU isotope center before the committee advances any appropriation. - An MOU or documentation from the State Fair describing how fair revenue will be used to offset bond debt service on the proposed arena and stalls.

Why it matters Capital reappropriations and new construction requests lock the state into multi‑year programs. Committee members repeatedly sought project status, match commitments and demonstrations that proposed projects will not create long‑term unfunded operating obligations.