Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vehicle Safety Headlights Wipers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would require headlights when windshield wipers are in use in limited conditions
Summary
Representative Philip Jones and supporters told the Transportation Committee HB 419 would add the words "whenever windshield wipers are active" to an existing RSA provision to require headlights in inclement weather; questioners pressed enforceability and edge cases such as automatic wipers and daytime running lights.
Representative Philip Jones returned to the committee to sponsor House Bill 419, which would add four words to an existing RSA provision requiring headlights: "whenever windshield wipers are active." Jones said the goal is to improve vehicle visibility during inclement conditions and cited research summarized by the U.S. Department of Transportation that found lower fatality rates and improved detection when lights accompany wipers.
Jones said the change is simple and widely adopted in 18 other states. He and witnesses argued the addition will increase visibility at dawn, dusk and in adverse weather without imposing complex technological requirements. Edward Haas, Keene city councilor and motorist safety advocate, testified in favor and described how he, as a cyclist, can more easily see vehicles when headlights are on.
Committee members questioned enforceability and exceptions. Representative Gieson asked whether daytime running lights would satisfy the requirement; Jones said the bill specifically says "headlights" but could be amended. Representatives Hill and others raised the problem of automatic wiper systems that may activate in light precipitation and asked how an enforcement officer could determine whether wipers were on; Jones and witnesses said discretion would be used and that the bill is intended for inclement weather conditions already specified elsewhere in statute (rain, snow, fog) and where view of the road is obstructed.
Sponsors said the bill is intended as a safety measure akin to existing headlight‑use statutes and to be enforced primarily by public education and secondary enforcement. No committee vote was recorded at the hearing.
