Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alcohol Delivery Labor topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would clarify that legally authorized visa workers may deliver alcohol
Summary
Senate Bill 89 would explicitly allow non‑citizen workers who are legally authorized to work in the U.S. to deliver alcohol; supporters said the change updates outdated statutory language and preserves age‑verification safeguards.
Get email alerts on the Alcohol Delivery Labor topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A bill introduced to the Senate Commerce Committee would clarify whether non‑citizen workers legally authorized to work in the United States may deliver alcoholic beverages. Jennifer Bosse (speaker identified in the hearing as Miss Bosse) introduced testimony in support of Senate Bill 89, describing the measure as a modernization of an outdated statute that had created uncertainty about whether H‑2B and J‑1 visa workers could be employed in roles involving delivery or service of alcohol.
"This bill provides clarity by explicitly allowing any noncitizen who is legally authorized to work in The US to also deliver alcohol," the testimony said, adding the change "does not alter existing safeguards" such as age verification and responsible‑sales requirements.
Mike Summers, president and CEO of the New Hampshire Lodging and Restaurant Association, told the committee the association worked with liquor enforcement while drafting language to make explicit that non‑citizen workers who are legally authorized to work in the United States may sell or deliver liquor. "It should read is, no person except the citizen of The United States or non United States citizen who is legally authorized to work in The United States shall be employed to sell or deliver any liquor or beverage," Summers said, offering language the association had prepared for the committee record.
Witnesses noted Senator O'Shardi (name referenced by testimony) planned to offer an amendment when the bill is executed; the Department of Liquor Enforcement had discussed the change with supporters. The committee recorded no formal vote during the hearing and closed testimony after supporters and staff answered questions.

