Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campaign Signs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council tables campaign‑sign and temporary‑sign amendments after debate on early‑voting window and enforcement
Summary
Council discussed proposed changes to campaign‑sign rules for city property and private property (land development code), including allowing signs during early voting, size limits on city property and designated off‑limits areas; members asked for a work session and the item was tabled for further review.
The Oviedo City Council on Feb. 3 discussed proposed amendments to city sign rules to clarify when and where campaign and other temporary noncommercial signs may be placed on city property and on private property, and asked staff to return with a work‑session review rather than moving immediately to ordinance language.
Key points of the staff proposal: Brian Cobb explained that existing City Code Section 30‑3 prohibits signs on city property except for a narrow carve‑out tied to the “actual day” of a primary, general or special election. Staff proposed aligning the rule with modern early‑voting practices by allowing signage at polling places beginning two hours before the opening of polls on the first day of early voting and continuing through the last day of the covered election; staff also proposed a maximum 6‑square‑foot size for permitted temporary signs on city property and reserving the right to designate off‑limits areas on public property (for example, park features or sight‑lines).
Free speech and enforcement concerns: Councilmembers asked about content neutrality and whether campaign signs could be regulated differently than other noncommercial/free‑speech signage; staff noted that content cannot be regulated but time, place and manner rules (size, location and permitting for commercial signage) are allowed. Members also discussed practical enforcement and the reality of out‑of‑town installers placing signs on city property.
Council decision: Several councilmembers asked for more time and for a dedicated work session to refine the rules, size limits and enforcement approach. Council tabled the item to a future work session and asked staff to return with clearer wording and enforcement options.
Ending: Staff will prepare a draft ordinance and bring the item back in a work session to allow Council to review precise language and enforcement practices before formal introduction.
