Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Apprenticeship Utilization Public Works topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bill would require apprentice-utilization plans and public transparency for responsible bidders on public works

2219285 · February 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 15-49 would change responsible-bidder criteria, require L&I to publish training-compliance and bidder information, and require awarded bidders on projects subject to apprentice-utilization rules to submit a detailed apprentice-utilization plan within 60 days of award.

House Bill 15-49 would revise responsible-bidder criteria for public works, require the Department of Labor & Industries to publish bidder training records and compliance information, and require all contractors awarded projects subject to apprentice-utilization requirements to submit an apprentice-utilization plan within 60 days of award.

Staff explained existing law and the proposed changes: currently bidders may qualify by completing three or more public works projects and holding a Washington business license for three or more years, or by designating an officer or employee who has received L&I-approved training on public works and prevailing wage. The bill narrows and clarifies those criteria and requires that training be recent (within three years) or that a bidder must have completed public works within the last three years without specified violations. L&I would maintain a public list of persons who have satisfied the training requirement.

The bill also expands transparency and planning for apprentice utilization. For projects subject to apprentice-utilization requirements (where a percentage of hours must be performed by apprentices), L&I would provide a template for apprentice-utilization plans; awarded bidders would submit a plan within 60 days of award; and L&I would publish completed plans on its website so training programs and contractors can coordinate.

Proponents from building trades and apprenticeships urged passage; Erin Frazier of the Washington State Building & Construction Trades Council said the bill "attempts to solve some of the issues our affiliates are seeing with upholding existing apprentice utilization requirements" and noted nearly 2,000 apprentices were out of work at the time of testimony. Chris Ellis (Bricklayers) described the proposal as a pragmatic step to connect contractors with apprenticeship programs and close the "opportunity shortage." Jared Ross (South Sound Building & Construction Trades) urged enforcement of existing contractual apprentice requirements instead of waiving them.

Some contracting and owner representatives raised practical concerns about timing and estimates. Jerry Vanderwood (AGC) said an apprentice-utilization plan 60 days after award may rely on estimates of labor hours and may not account for subs or training-agent status that change as projects progress. Ports and county engineers said they are still implementing a 2023 law that requires apprenticeship utilization in some public contracts and asked for time to adapt; they said the bill language differs from the WSDOT process some agencies already use.

The committee took testimony and left the measure pending further stakeholder work to reconcile timing, template details and implementation across agencies; no formal vote occurred.