Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Final Plat Moseley Heights topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Palatka planning board continues Moseley Heights final plat after staff and neighbors flag errors

2219066 · February 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City of Palatka Planning Board voted unanimously to continue consideration of the Moseley Heights final plat (case PB23-19) after staff and speakers identified mapping, boundary and naming issues and said the plat must comply with Florida Statute 177 before being sent to the City Commission.

The City of Palatka Planning Board on a unanimous vote moved to continue action on the Moseley Heights final plat (PB23-19) to the planning board’s next meeting on March 4, after staff and several attendees identified multiple errors and missing items on the submitted final plat.

Lorenzo, a city planner, told the board the application from A and M Home (applicant name in file) requested final plat approval for a six-lot residential subdivision at the northwest corner of Moseley Avenue and Edgeworth Street (parcel ID 13-10-106-3170-0010-0010). The preliminary plat had been approved by the planning board on Aug. 6, 2024. Lorenzo said lots 4, 5 and 6 were reconfigured to shorten depths to about 40 feet from about 230 feet to accommodate a stormwater drainage plan; the final plat shows a half-acre dry pond on the northwest corner of the tract.

Staff reviewed the plat against prior conditions from the board’s preliminary approval and noted specific corrections: removal of an incorrect recorded (REC) bearing on the northern boundary of Lot 1, addition of section/township/range in the plat description, and addition of the adjacent subdivision name (Brentwood Village) to the west. Lorenzo said the applicant supplied a title opinion dated that week stating no taxes were owed, and the applicant provided a third-party surveyor’s review that identified the three changes.

Board member Earl Wallace pressed staff and the applicant on multiple missing or unclear items. Wallace said the plat omitted the north boundary of Club Heights (an existing nearby subdivision) and other monument lines and described multiple problems as “not little things” that must be corrected before a recommendation to the City Commission. The board discussed two procedural options: require the applicant to make changes and return to the planning board, or recommend approval to the City Commission conditioned on meeting the outstanding items and with staff withholding scheduling before those conditions are met.

Applicant Toby McWigan (Green Cove Springs, Fla.) told the board she had not known Moseley Heights was an existing subdivision name until shortly before the meeting and said the homeowners association name and other items could be changed. Staff and the applicant discussed whether a mortgagee’s consent would be needed; staff advised the title opinion must show whether any mortgage exists or a mortgagee’s consent will be required.

After discussion, board members voted to continue the item to the planning board’s next meeting, with staff to provide a checklist of the statutory and platting items that must be corrected (Lorenzo referenced Florida Statute Chapter 177 in the discussion). Several public commenters, including Allegra Kitchens, supported the board’s decision to continue and called the submitted plat “sloppy.”

The continuation means staff will not transmit the plat to the City Commission for recordation until the listed corrections are completed and the board is satisfied the final plat complies with the statutory and local requirements.

The planning board’s action was procedural (a continuation); no final approval or denial of the final plat occurred at this meeting.